Original article right here.
Great info!
By Doug Newman
Follow me on Facebook.
If you would like to post this elsewhere, please email me and include a link to this URL. Thanks!
Posted at Daily Paul. Published in The Denver Post.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Even if you disagree with the acquittal of George Zimmerman, you have to admire the jurors’ courage. They were under absolutely immense pressure to convict. However, they were in the courtroom and heard all the testimony and observed all the evidence. All any of us outside the courtroom knew was what the media told us.
The Due Process guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments protect everyone, regardless of the severity of the charges, the weight of public opinion against the defendant or any external political or social circumstances. They protect George Zimmerman and they protect terror suspects. And if they don’t protect everyone equally, they don’t protect you or me.
Among the vilest aspects of American history is the historic inability of ethnic minorities to get a fair trial. Everyone has a right to Due Process regardless of their ethnicity as well as of the ethnicity of those they are accused of harming.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Denver Post limits letters to 150 words, so the above is what I submitted. However, I will add that in the last hour or so of deliberations, the jurors asked the judge for clarification of the definition of manslaughter. They tried to convict him of something. However, in the end, they evidently could not convict him of anything, so their only option was to acquit.
Please know that I did not pay much attention to this trial. Nor did I take sides during the proceedings. Nor am I in any way happy that Trayvon Martin is dead.
Take 8 minutes and watch this video. I am sorry Trayvon is dead. However, his death, as well as Saturday’s verdict, have been so grotesquely overblown. There are far, far, far bigger issues plaguing America. The orgy of media attention here is an attempt to distract us, and nothing more.
By Doug Newman
Follow me on Facebook.
Slight rework of something I originally wrote on May 21, 2009. If you would like to post this elsewhere, please email me and include a link to this URL. Thanks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You need to oppose the proposed Parental Rights Amendment (PRA) to the Constitution.
This Amendment is being promoted in response to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, a horribly anti-family treaty.
I oppose this Amendment for four reasons.
1) Parental rights are already covered by the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution — i.e. my favorite — which reads
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
2) The Tenth Amendment forbids Uncle Sam from intruding where not expressly authorized.
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
3) Section 2 of the PRA reads
“Neither the United States nor any state shall infringe upon this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.”
This is like saying that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed … unless the federal government demonstrates that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.”
The PRA actually puts a constitutional blessing on federal intrusion into parenting.
4) Thoreau once remarked that “There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking the root.” The PRA hacks at a branch of evil, i.e. the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The root of evil in this case is America’s very membership in the UN. America’s withdrawal from the UN — and kicking the UN off US soil — would rid America of a lot of problems.
Ron Paul once introduced the American Sovereignty Restoration Act, HR 1146, which would get the US out of the UN and vice versa. Read the actual text right here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was prompted to repost this when I read this damning analysis of the PRA. Take a few minutes and read it for yourself.
By Doug Newman
Follow me on Facebook.
“Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image … Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them.” — Exodus 20:4-5
I respect the American flag and I fully understand its importance to a lot of people. However, I stopped pledging allegiance to it a few years ago as I came to realize that to do so is a form of idolatry. Christians need to be aware of this and know just what they are doing when they pledge allegiance.
Take some time and read this excellent article.
By Doug Newman
Follow me on Facebook.
If you would like to post this elsewhere, please email me and include a link to this URL in your post. Thanks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“I freed a thousand slaves. I could have freed a thousand more if they only knew they were slaves.”
— Harriet Tubman
This July 4 we celebrate the 237th anniversary of our independence from Britain and our birth as a free nation. We will watch fireworks, go to barbecues, go camping (at tax-funded state and national parks), go to baseball games (in tax-funded stadiums) and hear endless talk about how dadgum wonderful it is that we live in a free country.
Or do we live in a free country?
In a free country, taxation would be well-nigh non-existent. You could keep what you earned and you could spend, save, invest and donate as you saw fit. You would have far more money with which to solve your own problems. Layabouts and sluggards would have to go to work and there would be much more compassion for the truly needy.
In a free country, the few legitimate functions of government would be funded by low, uniform, revenue tariffs – not, protective tariffs, mind you. There would be no direct federal taxation of the people.
In a free country, the national debt would be zero.
In a free country, there would not be 20,000-plus laws on the books infringing on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Crime would plummet as criminals – in both the private and public sectors – would never know who was armed.
In a free country, “homeland security” would be provided by a “well-regulated militia”, i.e. a populace that was well armed and highly skilled in marksmanship as well as teamwork in the field.
In a free country, on the morning of September 11, 2001, airline passengers could have packed heat legally. Any idiot knows that you don’t bring a knife to a gun fight. Air passengers would not have been such easy pickings. 9/11 would have been just another day.
In a free country, police brutality would be almost non-existent. The cops would be subject to the same penalties as the rest of us underlings when they violated the rights of others. They would not resemble an occupying army. Federal police agencies – IRS, FBI, DHS, TSA, DEA, CPS, BATF, NSA, yadda, yadda, yadda, yadda – would cease to exist altogether. There would be no federal funding for local police agencies, which would be under control of locally elected sheriffs rather than Uncle Sam.
In a free country, cops would not shoot harmless dogs.
In a free country, police would not have the power to “search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation.” Nor could they take your DNA without a warrant.
In a free country, guilt would be determined in court, subject to the requirements of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, rather than by police manhunts and media witch hunts.
In a free country, jurors could judge not only the facts pertaining to a given case, but also the law relevant to that case. If Juror Smith thought Defendant Jones was being unjustly tried for any reason, Juror Smith could vote to acquit on that basis and that basis alone and Defendant Jones would walk.
In a free country, you could educate your children as you saw fit without asking anyone’s permission. You could home school you kids if you wanted. Catholics could send their kids to the Our Lady of Mercy School; Baptists could send their kids to the Obadiah Baptist School; Mormons could send their kids to the Joseph Smith school; Muslims could send their kids to the Allah Akbar School; believers in Mungabunga could send their kids to Mungabunga school. If you are not spiritual, you could send your kids to the Whitney Houston School — “Where the children are the future” – or to the Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young School – “Where we teach your children well”. Prayer, declining academic standards, evolution, creation, condoms, busing, standardized testing, bullying, discipline, dress codes and all the other debates surrounding education today would cease to be social issues.
In a free country, businesses would not be crushed in a regulatory vise grip. There would not be an 81,000-page Federal Register. Millions of jobs would stay here in America rather than going to Honduras, Bangladesh and Red China.
In a free country, the military would be used strictly for national defense. Our foreign policy would be one of armed neutrality. We would not have troops in 135 countries. We would heed the Founders’ advice and steer clear of foreign alliances which have been nothing but trouble. Were we not throwing our weight around so recklessly “over there”, hatred and resentment toward the United States would be far, far less. Terrorism would cease to be a concern.
In a free country, war would only be fought for purely defensive purposes and then only with a formal congressional declaration of war. We would also realize that war for any other reason is a big government program. Not only is it ruinously expensive, but it brings with it, among other violations on liberty: taxes, debt, spying, censorship, commodities rationing, drafts and internment camps.
In a free country, there would not be a massive national security apparatus. There would be no Patriot Act. The authorities would have to obtain a judge’s warrant that met the standards spelled out in the Fourth Amendment in order to conduct a search of any kind for any reason. Americans would not be the “most spied upon people in world history.”
In a free country, we would not have the world’s highest incarceration rate. We would not have more people under “correctional supervision” – jail, prison, parole and probation – than Stalin had in the Gulag.
In a free country, the value of money would be tied to gold and/or silver. The Federal Reserve Bank would be shut down. We would not see our savings and our futures eroded by inflation. And we would not owe bazillions of dollars to folks who already have bazillions of dollars.
In a free country, it would take neither a village nor a police state to raise a child. Government would not act in loco parentis for an absentee Mommy and Daddy. Parents would again be responsible for raising their own children. Most of the problems we have with kids today – sex, drugs, violence, suicide – would be greatly minimized.
In a free country there would be no war on drugs. Drug profits and street crime would plummet. It would not be the government’s job to keep people off of drugs. It would be the job of parents, churches, Mungabunga temples, etc. In 1900, when there were no drug laws, there was almost no “drug problem” at all. (If Mungabunga people smoke that hooch in their rituals, they would be free to do so without fear of SWAT raids.)
In a free country, we would not constantly be relinquishing our freedom in exchange for security. People would know that the greatest threat to their security comes from their own government.
In a free country, if a state decided it had had enough of rule by Washington it could secede from the union without fear of reprisal. Likewise for sections of a state.
In a free country, there would be no laws forbidding what you could ingest into your body. If you were sick or in pain, and if a certain remedy worked, you could take it without fear of punishment. There would be no FDA, and hence no need for federal approval.
In a free country, Uncle Sam would not interfere in medicine at all.
In a free country, there would be no forced drugging or medication of people.
In a free country, there would be no welfare state, education state or medical state. There would not be a permanent underclass, the quality of education would be vastly improved, and healthcare would be far less expensive. Deadbeats would not come here looking for a handout. Immigrants could come here freely and would, out of social and economic necessity, learn English. Most of the “immigration problem” would take care of itself.
In a free country, there would be no Federal Departments of Energy, Commerce or HUD.
In a free country, there would be no minimum wage. Millions of jobs would be created overnight in the inner cities, Appalachia and the Rio Grande Valley. Congressmen, senators and other elected things could legally be paid what they are worth.
In a free country, there would be no draft registration. Young men would not be so many slabs of meat for the military grinder. There would be no “national service” or any other form of involuntary servitude.
In a free country, there would be no surrender of sovereignty to entities like the UN, where we can be outvoted 2-1 by such paragons of freedom as Saudi Arabia and North Korea. Our troops would not be involved in UN sponsored wars. NATO and the International Criminal Court would have no relevance. Our foreign policy would be based on, as Jefferson put it, “peace, commerce and honest friendship with all and entangling alliances with none.” “All” would include North Korea and “none” would include Israel.
In a free country, people could trade freely with whomever they wanted. There would be no protective tariffs, sanctions or embargoes.
In a free country, any law or treaty which ran contrary to the Bill of Rights would be null and void.
In a free country, there would be no aid to any foreign government.
In a free country, there would be no “promise” of Social Security at age 62 or 65 or 67 or … how far back will they have moved it when you reach your golden years? You could take that same money and put it in the most profitable private sector investments you could find. Furthermore, you would not be constantly tracked by means of your Social Security Number.
In a free country, a biometric National ID card would be unthinkable.
In a free country, children could open lemonade stands without fear of arrest.
In a free country, you would only be punished if you inflicted actual harm on another person or their property. Non-violent drug offenders would not waste away in cages, while convicted rapists and murderers went free.
In a free country, churches would truly be exempt from taxation, which would be minimal to begin with. Pastors would not be chilled into silence about the welfare/warfare/police state by 501c3 regulations.
In a free country, there would be no government bailouts for automobile makers, Wall Street or any other private sector entity.
In a free country, you could grow whatever plants you wanted without fear of punishment or any other interference. Hemp could be used – legally – for fuel, food, fiber, concrete, paper, textiles, health care and numerous other purposes. The environmental benefits would be huge.
In a free country, you could produce, sell, or consume raw milk freely.
In a free country, you could gamble online freely.
In a free country, there would be no national drinking age.
In a free country, a lockdown, a “shelter-in-place” order or any other such clampdown for a city or group of cities would be unthinkable.
In a free country, no political party would have any government granted privilege. Ballot access would not be an issue for non-privileged parties and candidates. Candidates would not receive “matching funds” or any other government assistance.
In a free country, every place from Maine to Hawaii and from Key West to the Aleutian Islands would be a free speech zone.
In a free country, ignorance of the law would be a valid defense.
In a free country, the internet would be free from government interference.
In a free country, your right to resist arrest would be secure. So would your right to record police misdeeds.
In a free country, there would not be surveillance drones patrolling the skies monitoring your every move.
In a free country, the Army would never dream of driving tanks through the streets.
In a free country, the president would not maintain “kill lists.” (If the authorities can track us with surveillance drones, why can’t they just kill us on the spot with predator drones?)
In a free country, there would not be a “no-fly list”. Uncle Sam could not arbitrarily interfere with anyone’s right to travel.
In a free country, there would be no racial or other kind of profiling. Uncle Sam could not arbitrarily categorize people for any reason.
In a free country, polluters would be subject to strict liability for any harm inflicted on others. There would be no special protection for companies like BP.
In a free country, there would be no federal disaster or emergency management agencies. As taxation would be minimal, local areas would have far more resources with which to solve their own problems without Uncle Sam pulling the strings. Foreign donations of aid to disaster victims would not be interdicted at the border.
In a free country, there would be no federal student loans. The cost of higher education would plummet.
In a free country, there would be a free market in light bulbs.
In a free country, the president could not have you arbitrarily arrested and indefinitely detained on the basis of a mere accusation without any due process whatsoever. Habeas corpus would be secure.
In a free country, the president could not rule by executive order. Other than granting pardons, he could do nothing without congressional approval.
In a free country, Congress would exercise its power under Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution to restrict the scope and authority of the federal courts. Judges who based their rulings on anything other than the Constitution would be impeached swiftly. Shari’a law would cease to be a concern.
In a free country, we would not have adopted nine of the ten “planks” of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto. How have we done this? How have the ten planks replaced the Bill of Rights and the Ten Commandments?
In a free country, your property rights would not be under attack. (Plank 1) There would be no zoning laws. You could not lose your home or business for failure to pay taxes. There would be no EPA harassment of landowners over “wetlands” and other issues. The FEDGOV would not be the nation’s largest landowner.
In a free country, there would be no progressive income tax or, for that matter, any taxes on income. (Plank 2)
In a free country, there would be no inheritance tax. (Plank 3)
In a free country, there would be no confiscation of property of those who resisted the powers that be. (Plank 4) There would be no civil asset forfeiture laws.
In a free country, there would not be a central bank. (Plank 5) There would be no Federal Reserve and we would not have an umpteengazillion dollar national debt.
In a free country, there would be no government control of communications and transportation. (Plank 6) There would be no FCC, DOT, ICC, etc. Airports would not be mini-police states. Sexual assault would not be a condition of travel.
In a free country, there would be no government intrusion in manufacturing and agriculture. (Plank 7) There would be no Department of Labor or Department of Agriculture. Your business could not be shut down for OSHA violations. There would be no federal farm subsidies or price supports.
In a free country, there would be no federal control of labor. (Plank 8) There would be no National Labor Relations Board, no minimum wage laws, no affirmative action or racial quotas.
The merger of agriculture and industry (Plank 9) is tough to explain in one paragraph. The centralizers can only be happy that farming is increasingly controlled by conglomerates that are far more likely to kiss up to the FEDGOV than a family that has worked the same piece of land for four generations.
In a free country, the government would not be in control of education. (Plank 10) While neither the Bible nor any of America’s Founding documents say anything about state education, you will find state education as a policy prescription of the Communist Manifesto.
In a free country, people would understand that liberty is a gift from God and not a privilege to be granted and withheld by government. They would likewise understand that liberty is preserved NOT by perpetual war, but rather by eternal vigilance of informed citizens against encroachments by government at all levels.
America is not a free country.
I know, I know, I know: I can vote and I can write this without fear of punishment. And no one is being hauled off to death camps in America. At least not yet.
The incineration of 80 innocent people by the FEDGOV at Waco in 1993 was a trial balloon floated before a brainwashed nation. Millions of Americans derisively giggled at “that cult.” When they came for the Davidians, we did not say anything because we were not Davidians.
Today, millions of Americans still buy the lie that America is a free country. Hitler knew the power of the lie: if you lie to people often enough, they will believe anything. And while we are not at the Hitler phase yet, we will arrive there if we keep believing everything our ruling class – or at least our preferred faction of this class – says and believing we are a free nation. You cannot have it both ways.
Yes, we have a measure of liberty left. But we are giving it up at a frightening rate.
Sadly, some people will not clue in until the death camp phase. I pray fervently that enough Americans wake up before then.
I am a Christian and Scripture tells me to preach the truth without ceasing, for there will come a time when people will not want to hear the truth. Rather, they will surround themselves with ear-ticklers who will tell them whatever they want to hear, regardless of how preposterous.
People ask me if I get frustrated fighting the freedom fight in a society where so many will gladly relinquish that freedom. Yes I do! However, in late 1991, God called me to be a watchman and to warn everyone I could of the tyranny descending on America. I must continue to fight this fight and leave the results up to Him. I invite you to join me.
A free country would not be a perfect country. However it would be the best possible country.
I am not going to wish you a happy Independence Day, as the spirit of July 4, 1776 has been lost for at least a century in America.
So, I will just wish you a happy Fourth of July.
By Doug Newman
Follow me on Facebook.
Posted at Daily Paul and Freedom4um.
If you would like to post this elsewhere, please email me and include a link to this URL. Better yet, please just link to it, as I update my articles frequently. Thanks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?
– Galatians 4:16
GW Bush outspent Kommunist Klinton by $1 trillion per year and added $5 trillion to the debt. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush gave us Medicare Part D, which greatly expanded federal involvement in healthcare. When he left office about two-thirds of the medical market place was under government control through Medicare and Medicaid. Those who healed themselves with marijuana risked spending years in anal rape cages. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush gave us the Patriot Act, which gave Uncle Sam broad scope to spy on us without warrants, as the Fourth Amendment requires. Obama dramatically expanded the NSA’s PRISM program. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush gave us No Child Left Behind. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush also gave us DHS, TSA and guilt without trial. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush never lifted a finger to restore Second Amendment rights. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush signed off on taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood every year. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush said ONE THING about Jesus ONE TIME when he was campaigning for president in 2000, and that was all it took for millions of right-wing Churchians to go gonzo crazy over him. (And they were in total denial about his reckless expansion of government.) Obama, too, has claimed to be a Christian. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush started wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama started a war against Libya and is about to start one against Syria. He has committed acts of war against Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia and has threatened war against Iran. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush started drone attacks. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
GW Bush signed into law the ban on manufacture and sale of many incandescent light bulbs. If you liked Bush, why do you hate Obama?
Why do I say this? Why do I bring up Bush as he is long gone? Because bigger and more important issues persist: the two parties are identical and the majority of Americans just don’t get it. They – and their respective media pimps – talk differently. However, once elected, they both do the same thing. They both radically expand the welfare and warfare states.
And in election after election, millions cling to the totally false hope that Republicans will bring less government. Republicans have a history of campaigning like Patrick Henry and governing like Maxine Waters. They are no more likely to restore liberty than Obama is to give you something for nothing.
Does anyone seriously think that the guy who brought the health mandate to Massachusetts was going to repeal Obamacare? When have Republicans ever repealed a single one of the programs that they insist they hate so much?
No matter who occupies the White House anymore, they can count on millions of people virtually worshiping them. This is especially true for our last two presidents. It is chilling to think what the cult of personality surrounding the next president will look like. Scripturally speaking, this is part of what I call the Big Ramp-Up to the Antichrist. Revelation 13:3 tells of an omnipotent political ruler who is worshiped the world over.
When Ronald Reagan came to Washington in 1981, the debt was less than a $1 trillion, the federal budget was $600 billion, one in 50 Americans was on food stapmps and there were 300,000 people in prison. Today, the debt is almost $17 trillion, the federal budget is over $4 trillion, one in seven Americans is on food stamps and there are 2.2 million people in prison. For 28 of the last 32 years we have had a Republican president and/or a Republican majority in either the House or Senate.
“But Republican’s pick better judges.” No they don’t. When GW Bush left office, seven of the nine supreme Court justices were appointed by Republicans, as were about two-thirds of all federal judges. And the federal bench was still an unholy mess.
Is this “less government and more freedom”?
If you liked Bush, you ought to love Obama.
When you vote for people like Bush and Romney, you only enable people like Obama.
And if you like Obama, you really should love the next Republican president, who will very probably radically outspend and outtyrannize Obama. I have heard it said that the modern presidency is like one big Fibonacci Sequence: every president builds on his predecessor’s legacy.
Every bad thing that is happening in this country has been happening since for at least 100 years. Merely replacing one guy in one office in a nation of 320 million people will solve nothing.
So what should you do? Do what I did in 1992: walk off the two-party plantation. You have no “duty” to vote for the “lesser of two evils”. Don’t just listen to what candidates say. Look VERY CAREFULLY at what they have done – not said, DONE! – in their past. That is all you have to go on. And if no “electable” candidate measures up, then vote for non-privileged candidate, such as one from the Libertarian or Constitution Party. This applies to the presidency all the way down to the town council.
And if no candidate on your ballot is truly pro-liberty, then just don’t vote. I have left lots of spots on my ballot blank in recent years. It is not a sin.
I would rather do the right thing and lose than do the wrong thing and win.
What shall it profit a man…?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Don’t just take it from me. Take it from The Decider himself.
By Doug Newman
Follow me on Facebook and Daily Paul.
If you would like to post this elsewhere, please email me and include a link to this URL. Better yet, please just post a link, as I update many of my articles frequently.
“““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““`
A Saturday headline prompted me to outline three basic rules about the growth of tyranny.
Rule 1: Tyranny always comes wrapped in somebody’s good intention.
“Police and prosecutors from across the country told smartphone manufacturers on Thursday that they must take steps to solve the ‘epidemic ‘of thefts involving mobile devices – and they need to do it right away.
“A coalition of law enforcement officials, political leaders and consumer groups, called the Secure Our Smartphones (S.O.S) Initiative, wants a ‘kill switch’ installed on all new smartphones that would make them useless anywhere in the world if they are reported stolen.”
Who can argue with the intentions here? No one can, anymore than they can argue with the intentions of laws that purport to protect us from terrorism or make healthcare more affordable.
Who should be concerned about the implications of this? Everyone should.
(On December 20, California State Senator Mark Leno [D. – San Franpsycho] announced that he would introduce a smartphone kill switch bill in January.)
Rule 2: Always ask what is next. Tyranny always grows bigger and uglier.
The original personal income tax was implemented in 1913. It had a top rate of six percent. The bottom bracket – one percent – only applied to those with incomes over $20,000 per year, e.g. Ty Cobb. No one ever dreamed that it would morph into the monstrosity that we so fear today.
The Patriot Act was sold to us as necessary “to go after the terrorists.” And who were the terrorists? Everyone knew who the terrorists were. It was those guys over there. You know, those scary looking brown guys with names like Ahmed and Omar. Few thought that it was a “gateway drug” that would pave the way for the NSA’s Orwellian PRISM program which can track every piece of information that moves electronically.
The original duty of police was to hunt down and apprehend murders, rapists, thieves and other violent criminals. They were fairly benign and most people – including yours truly – considered them to be on the side of the citizens. Who ever imagined that they would come to resemble an occupying army?
Rule 3: Government is always more dangerous than the problems it is supposed to cure.
Does anyone seriously think that, once implemented, mandatory “kill switch” technology will only be used to solve crimes involving smartphones? Does anyone seriously think that a government that reserves the right to spy, search, imprison and kill without due process could restrain itself in the use of such technology?
Two months ago, a million residents of the Boston area were treated to a horrifying exhibit of police state tyranny. Buses and trains were shut down, and the streets were full of militarized police executing door-to-door warrantless searches in pursuit of the surviving Boston Marathon bombing suspect.
If such measures were necessary here, why are they not necessary every time there is a suspect on the loose? And if the authorities have the technology and authority to shut down some smartphones, why wouldn’t they want the ability to shut down all smartphones?
And if they will do this, what will they do next?
Watch this video. It is not at all gratuitous. All the information is taken from mainstream media sources. The American police state has grown to positively horrifying proportions, especially since 9/11. Local police departments everywhere have become far more federalized and militarized. As always, it is advertised as necessary to keep us safe.
What is even more frightening is that so many people persist in their belief that all of this “serves and protects” them.
If you are such a person, just remember that in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia the police had very extensive powers. And there wasn’t a lot of street crime. Would you want to live in either place?
By Doug Newman
Originally published here on June 6, 2009. Reposting in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Maryland v. King decision, which says that cops can take your DNA without a warrant.
Follow me on Facebook.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“Take My DNA — I Have Not Committed Any Crimes”
I was going back and forth on a Facebook discussion thread the other evening and someone made the above remark.
My first thought was to quote my favorite motivational speaker, Matt Foley: “Well la-de-frigging-daaaaaaa.” Such is the nonchalance with which so many Americans are relinquishing what is left of their liberty.
If this woman who posted this remark is so willing to ignore her Fourth Amendment rights and to have her body violated, would she also submit to, say, a strip search in front of God and everyone at the local shopping mall? How about a cavity search right in the middle of the main intersection of her town?
Time and again, in the Patriot Act world, people tell me “if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.”
I have plenty to hide: my life, my privacy, my dignity, my self-respect. If you have probable cause that I have done something wrong, get a judge’s warrant and then we will have something to talk about. Otherwise, leave me alone.
*****
“The makers of the Constitution conferred, as against the government, the Right to be left alone; the most comprehensive of rights, and the right most valued by civilized men.
– Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, Olmstead v. United States – 1928″
There is one other and far more important issue here: the presumption of innocence. Are you going to make a criminal out of me if I refuse to submit to a warrantless search? After all, my refusal to submit MUST mean I am hiding something.
A minute ago, I was just walking along minding my own business. Now, you are going to totally interrupt my life and make a criminal out of me because I just want to be left alone?
And if you are so nonchalant about your 4th Amendment rights how about your other Bill of Rights guarantees? How about other things such as Habeas Corpus, Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto laws?
When we disregard the presumption of innocence, we lose America.
I see way too many parallels between America in 2009 and Germany in 1933. Hitler did not get elected on a Monday and start loading the Jews onto box cars on Tuesday. Bit by bit by bit he persuaded the German people to give up their liberty, and bit by bit by bit they went along.
Oh sure, they got it back in 1945.
For decades in America, the powers that be have been telling the us that we need to give up our liberty and the American people by and large have complied. This creeping tyranny is always implemented for some noble-sounding reason. The left always tells us it is “for the children” or to fight global warming. The right always tells us it is to fight drugs and terrorism.
*****
The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants.
— Albert Camus
*****
America, “the land of the free”, now has the world’s highest incarceration rate. All 10 policy planks of the Communist Manifesto have been part of the law of the land for years.
I write this on D-Day, June 6. The more I live and learn, the more I believe most of America’s wars have been staged events. Be that as it may, the average soldier, sailor, airman and marine believes he is leaving home and hearth for your and my freedom. Hundreds of thousands, perhaps over a million, Americans have given their lives over the last 234 years so that you and I can live and breathe in freedom, relative freedom thought it may be in recent decades.
And how do people like this woman who said “Take my DNA – I have not committed any crimes” thank them? How do they “support” them?
“Oh, I’ll give up my freedom.”
Don’t tell me about Jane Fonda at the Hanoi Hilton and don’t tell me about the dozen or so people every year who desecrate the American flag. Have a good long look in the mirror!
It is bad enough that our troops have been lied to in the way they have. It is even worse when so many people take their liberty so lightly.
If America ever comes under full-blown totalitarianism – and it is on a bobsled ride in that direction as we speak – it won’t be because of some dorko in a cave in Afghanistan with a diaper on his head. And it won’t be because of Big Crock Obama. It was because of people on your street, people next to you in the checkout line, people next to you in church and people whose your kids play little league with your kids. The American people in 2009 – left-wing Obama groupies and right-wing Bush groupies alike – are just like the German people of 1933. They will give away their freedom.
I used to say this to left-wingers who wanted the government to solve all their problems and provide cradle-to-grave economic security. Now I say it to right-wingers who are willing to give up their civil liberties in the name of freedom and security. MOVE TO CUBA! MOVE TO NORTH KOREA! That is where they do things YOUR WAY!
*****
“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.”
– Ecclesiastes 1:9
*****
The times, technology, terminology and actors on the stage may change, but human stupidity doesn’t. Don’t let history repeat itself.
——————————————————————————-
If you want to post this on Facebook, please just go ahead. If you want to post this off of Facebook, please email me and include a link to this URL.
By Doug Newman – email me
Follow me on Facebook.
Posted at Liberty Calling, Reddit, Veracity Voice, The Free Thought Project, Liberty Crier and Daily Paul. I update this periodically, as I become aware of new stories. Therefore, if you want to post this elsewhere, please just link to this URL instead. Thanks!
It is easy to stand up and cheer for your favorite government activity. It is quite another to acknowledge what it means in the real world.
I almost never try to speak for other people. However, I think it is fairly safe to say that the average military recruit firmly believes that he joins the military so that you and I can live and breathe in freedom. To be sure, he had other reasons for joining, but I think the defense of liberty is a fairly common characteristic.
That is certainly what I thought when I was in Navy boot camp in Orlando, Florida, in 1983. After all, this is what I had been told all my life: sailors, soldiers, airmen and marines defend freedom.
But is this actually what they do?
Consider the following:


Army veteran Bradford Bates was beaten senseless by cops in Pasadena, Texas, who entered his home without a search warrant. He was wrongfully charged with felony assault and spent a year in prison.
During World War II, baseball legend Joe DiMaggio served three years in the Army Air Corps. His parents, however, were designated as “enemy aliens” because of their Italian ancestry and forbidden from traveling outside a five-mile radius of their home in San Francisco.
Nicholas McGehee, an Army sergeant and Purple Heart winner was fatally shot by Tooele County, Utah, sheriff’s deputies after his wife called 911 because he head injured his foot.
Tommy Yancy served in the Army in Afghanistan and Iraq. He was beaten to death by police near Imperial, California, after being pulled over for a missing front license plate.
Bill Swan, 80, of Lone Jack, Missouri, is an Army veteran who took issue with utility crews digging on his property. He called the police, who proceeded to beat him leaving him bloodied with several broken bones.
Marine Corporal Alexander DeVillena, who had harmed nobody, was fatally shot by Palm Springs, California police officers, who were later cleared of any wrongdoing.
Raymond Keith Martinez, a homeless and, more importantly, harmless, Marine Corps veteran was shot and killed in cold blood by a cop in West Monroe, Louisiana.


Coast Guard veteran Walter Scott was unarmed when he was shot and killed while running away from a police officer in North Charleston, South Carolina. (This video went absolutely viral.)


William Livsey is an 84-year-old retired four-star Army General whose accolades include Defense Distinguished Service Medal, the Silver Star, the Legion of Merit and the Distinguished Flying Cross. He says he is “ashamed to be an American” after he was brutally arrested following a minor disagreement with a delivery person in Fayetteville, Georgia.
morning on January 1, 2012, Buehler was arrested for taking a few pictures of Austin police manhandling a young woman outside a 7-11. Buehler has been arrested four times since. He heads the Peaceful Streets Project, whose members work to expose abuse, brutality and overreach both in Austin and across the nation.There are no doubt numerous other injustices against veterans that I do not know about. Enough to fill a book. None of these things would have happened if America were a free society. As Kokesh puts it, “The greatest enemies to the Constitution are not to be found in the sands of some far off land but rather right here at home.”
I cannot speak to the specific political beliefs of most of the veterans I have mentioned here. Some may be pacifists, while others may make John McCain look like a hippie in Haight-Ashbury. No matter what their individual views may be, the freedom they risked their lives for was flagrantly violated on the streets of the land they fought to protect.

With a maximum capacity of 192 nuclear warheads, just one Ohio-class American submarine is the world’s sixth largest nuclear power.
Society endlessly applauds sailors, soldiers, airmen and Marines for “fighting for our freedom”. It is in no way disrespectful to say that this is not what they do. No foreign government or terrorist group poses any threat to our liberty. America accounts for about half of the world’s military spending. We have 400 ships in our Navy, plus thousands of planes, tanks and nuclear warheads as well as 300 million firearms in private hands. Nobody is going to invade us.
In a constitutional country, which America ceased to be 100 years ago, the job of the military – a vital and most noble one – is to defend the borders, shores and airspace. It cannot protect you from being tyrannized domestically. Indeed, throughout history, armies have been instruments of domestic tyranny. Our Constitution forbids a standing army for just this reason.
Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia had enormous military establishments. How did things work out in these countries?
I am a Christian who believes liberty is a gift from God – Leviticus 25:10; II Corinthians 3:17; Galatians 5:1. To quote Jefferson, liberty is preserved not by military might, but by “eternal vigilance” against one’s own government at all levels. It is the grossest form of disrespect to send young men around the world to “fight for freedom” while relinquishing that freedom on the home front.
For several years, America has had the world’s highest incarceration rate. Since 2001, Americans have gladly accepted previously unthinkable intrusions on their freedom in the name of “safety” and “security”. These include, but are not limited to: warrantless searches and spying, the suspension of habeas corpus, sexual assault as a condition of travel, rampant police brutality, indefinite detention without any semblance of due process, severe restrictions on peaceful protest, massive ammunition purchases by DHS and surveillance drones in our skies watching our every move. Can predator drones be far behind? And in every election 98 percent of voters put their stamp of approval on perpetuating this monstrosity.
On April 20, 2013, Boston and several surrounding towns got a serious taste of martial law. How many military veterans were on the receiving end of this? Is this what they signed up to fight for?
Stop thinking in clichés. Have a good hard look at everything your media and government tell you. This includes media outlets and parts of the government that you like. Study. Read. Ask questions. And learn that the defense of liberty is not the duty of the military. Rather, it is your duty and mine. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~