Was the Constitution a “Con”?

Strict adherence to the Constitution, such as advocated by Ron Paul would undoubtedly result in MUCH smaller government and MUCH more personal liberty. It would be a massive improvement not only on what we have now, but on anything we have had in our lifetimes.

That said, the more I think about it, the more I think that the Articles of Confederation, America’s governing document between 1781 and 1787, was superior to the Constitution.



articles constitution chart

Graphics source: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10025094080

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

While They Are At It, Let Them Erase All Memory of Abe Lincoln

Please email me here.
Here I am on Facebook.
If you would like to post this elsewhere, please include a link to this URL. Thanks!

Vandals tagged the Lincoln Memorial with graffiti the other day. Why stop with graffiti? Let them eradicate all memory of Abe Lincoln. After all Lincoln was an absolutely vile racist and white supremacist.

Consider just a few quotes.

  • “I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause]—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.” (Source: Lincoln-Douglas debates.)
  • “I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. … I … am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position. I have never said anything to the contrary.” (Source: Lincoln-Douglas debates.)
  • “I give him the most solemn pledge that I will to the very last stand by the law of this State, which forbids the marrying of white people with Negros.” (Source: Lincoln-Douglas debates.)
  • “Let us be brought to believe it is morally right, and, at the same time, favorable to, or, at least, not against, our interest, to transfer the African to his native clime, and we shall find a way to do it, however great the task may be.” (Source: Speech at Springfield, Illinois in 1857.)
  • “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it.” (Source: Letter to Horace Greeley in 1862.)
  • I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” (Source: First Inaugural Address in 1861.)

It’s not just Lincoln’s words, but his deeds as well, that were contemptible.

  • He supported the Fugitive Slave Act, which made it a crime to harbor runaway slaves.
  • He supported a proposed constitutional amendment which would have forbidden Uncle Sam from interfering with slavery in states where it already existed, and stated that he had “no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.”
  • He instituted the first military draft in American history, and sent federal troops to suppress the bloody riots that broke out in New York City.
  • He imposed the first income tax in American history, i.e. forcing “free” Americans for the first time to labor involuntarily for the benefit of others.
  • Wait! There’s more! A whole lot more.

And, yes, I hear the train a comin’: What about the Emancipation Proclamation?

The Emancipation Proclamation is a short document of just over 700 words. You can read it here. It is as significant both for what it says and what it doesn’t say.

  • It only “freed” the slaves in the Confederacy, which was at the time and independent sovereign nation in which Lincoln had no jurisdiction.
  • It did not apply in the areas around New Orleans and Norfolk, Virginia, which had come under control of Union military forces.
  • It also did not apply in the 48 counties which were about to become the new state of West Virginia.
  • It did not apply in Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland and Missouri which, although in the Union, still had legal slavery.
  • Hence, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free any slaves.

Slavery came to an end not because of but, rather, in spite of Abe Lincoln and the war he initiated. No other country “needed a war” to end slavery. It came to an end because it was no longer economically viable and because of a spreading conviction in the hearts and minds of Americans that it was just plain evil. Instead of freeing people, Lincoln and the war he initiated set the table for an all-powerful federal government that will one day make us all slaves. Indeed, he was the Great Centralizer.

It has been said that, in the early days of this republic, the closest contact most people had with the federal government was when the mailman came by. That all started to change with Abe Lincoln.

The war did not at all “settle” the secession and nullification questions. Saying that it did is like saying that “my kid beat up your kid, so therefore my kid is right.”

If those who would relegate all vestiges of slavery, racism and white supremacy to the dustbin of history have any intellectual consistency whatsoever, they need to get busy eradicating the memory of Abe Lincoln.



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wanted: Mind Over Madness

By Doug Newman – email me here.
Here I am on Facebook.
If you would like to post this elsewhere – who knows why? – please just link to this URL. Thanks!

Opposing police thuggery DOES NOT automatically make one a member of BLM or Antifa; opposing the official narrative on the War of Northern Aggression DOES NOT automatically make one pro-slavery, a white supremacist or a Nazi; opposing Obama DOES NOT automatically make one a racist; opposing Trump DOES NOT automatically make one a liberal.

It’s all getting so tiresome.

Is this the way it’s going to be now? Are we going to be totally driven by emotion and not reason? Are we going to call names and take our paradigm and quit whenever anyone says something we disagree with? Yes, I know people are driven by emotions rather than logic … I am no exception. But at some point, we have to rein in our emotions and engage our minds.

It doesn’t matter what the majority does.

It doesn’t matter what your friends do.

It matters what you do.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are Cops Constitutional?

Some very fascinating history in this article.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Trump Wouldn’t Let Me Immigrate

Under the RAISE Act, proposed by Senators Tom Cotton (R-Hell) and David Perdue (R-Hell), someone with my profile would not be able to immigrate to the United States. Trump supports this!


Read this article.

And read the actual text of the bill – the points system starts on page 25.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

US Police Kill More Every Few Days than Those in Other Countries Kill in Years

  1. We don’t have the world’s highest crime rate. We’re not even close.
  2. Violent crime rates have dropped substantially over the last few decades.
  3. On-the-job police fatalities are at some of the lowest levels in decades.
  4. Are the cops wrong all the time? NO! However, it is not just stupid, but it is also downright dangerous to assume that they are right all the time.
  5. Even so, this compilation of death-by-cop statistics ought to really rattle you.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Just Because the Cops Say Something Doesn’t Make It True

By Doug Newman – email me here.
Here I am on Facebook.
If you would like to post this elsewhere – who knows why? – please just link to this URL. Thanks!

aurora brutality

The Aurora PD in a separate incident from 2012.

This isn’t about “he said she said”, but rather “cop said citizen said”.

On April 1, near the corner of Colfax and Sable in Aurora, Colorado – a 10-minute drive from where I live – police Sergeant Kevin Barnes shot motorist Michael Torres, seriously injuring him. Barnes will not face charges.

According to KDVR Channel 31 in Denver,

“Officers wanted to arrest Michael Torres, who they said was wanted for aggravated motor vehicle theft. Police said they believed he was armed and dangerous.

“When police tried to arrest Torres, he took off in his car and Sgt. Kevin Barnes fired his rifle three times, the district attorney’s office stated.”

Thus said the cops.

“A background check on Torres did not find anything indicating he was wanted for aggravated motor vehicle theft and his family insisted he was innocent of the alleged crimes.”

Hence, the cops had no reason to pursue Torres.

“The investigation demonstrated that Mr. Michael Torres was aware that the police were following him and made aggressive maneuvers with his vehicle to avoid apprehension,” the statement said.

“At the time Sergeant Barnes fired his weapon, he stated he was in fear for his life, the lives of his fellow officers and citizens.”

“The evidence does not support the filing of any criminal charges against Sergeant Barnes.”

Thus said the cops.

“Torres’ girlfriend, Stephanie Cervantes-Facio, was in the vehicle with him during the shooting. She said police rammed the back of the vehicle, sending it away from officers and into a ditch.”

“She said she looked over and saw Torres had been shot. She said there was no gun in the vehicle, prompting questions about the officer’s decision to fire.”

“It was terrifying. I have never felt so scared in my life. I thought I was going to die. I have never been around gun shots or that kind of police brutality,” Cervantes-Facio said.

So who’s right? The cops or their victims?

We know that a cop shot a man, seriously injuring him, and will not get as much as a slap on the wrist.

Everything else the cops have said here is an accusation. None of it has ever been tested in court.  Sergeant Barnes has never had to prove that he was in imminent danger like a non-cop would have to if he claimed self-defense. Michael Torres never got any due process.

aurora-theater-nytexaminer. jpgThe Aurora Police arrested mass murder suspects James Holmes and Nathan Dunlap without incident and gave them their due process before sentencing them to prison. In Dunlap’s case, he was given a death sentence. Why did the Aurora Police see the need to shoot Michael Torres on sight, with the potential of killing him?

Just because the cops said Michael Torres stole one vehicle and “made aggressive maneuvers” with another doesn’t make either accusation true.

Just because the cops said someone was a serial child molester doesn’t automatically make that person a serial child molester.

Just because the FBI or the DHS said someone was a terrorist doesn’t automatically make that person a terrorist.

Just because, for example, a business client or a former spouse said you did something horrible doesn’t automatically mean you did something horrible.

Just because the cops said something doesn’t make it true. It doesn’t make it false either. However, you cannot just shoot someone based merely on an accusation.

The presumption of innocence is sacred. If you are a Christian like me it is Literally Sacred. It is the Golden Rule – Matthew 7:12 – in its purest form. Have you ever been falsely accused? If so, my guess is that you didn’t enjoy it and you wanted the chance to defend yourself.

Do cops always lie? Certainly not! But do they always tell the truth? Again, certainly not!

dare cops donutsYou have to be brain dead to believe the cops – or, for that matter, any other group of people – always tell the truth. You have to be brain dead to believe that issuance of a blue uniform, a badge and a perpetually open tab at Dunkin’ Donuts elevates one to a higher moral plane upon which one is absolutely incapable of wrongdoing.

I can’t help thinking that some of these Facebook comments summarize the thinking of a significant percentage of Americans. Among them:

RG: “Let’s try something new. Listen to cops, don’t get shot.”

LL: “Here’s an idea….don’t commit crimes, and don’t run from the police!

LB: “I agree with all cops shootings until society stops thier War on the men in blue.”

Millions of Americans will automatically believe the cops because, well … because cops!

Cop. Him good. Him serve in community. Him keep me safe.

limits of tyrants

Original quote from Frederick Douglass. Source: http://bit.ly/2tVNpVM

The cops’ word is good enough for them. The cops’ accusations are always true and anyone who happens to be in their way must be guilty … because cops! And anyone who questions cops hates cops and America and God and, well … everything good!

We just came through a 4-day orgy of fireworks, hot dogs, beer and baseball in which we purport to celebrate the anniversary of the signing of a document that reads in part: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

When cops can shoot people with impunity, people are neither equal nor free.

You are far more likely to meet a police officer than anyone you voted for. These encounters represent the interface between the individual and the state. When you read about an officer-involved shooting, or any other example of police abuse, do you (a) automatically side with the cops or do you (b) start asking serious questions and demanding hard evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the victim? This, and not your party affiliation, determines your true political stance.

July 4 weekend has passed and life is somewhat back to normal. We are sitting in front of our computers and HELLevision sets moaning and groaning about all the tyrants and criminals in Washington and wondering how they ever got there. It’s not hard to figure out at all. When you excuse tyranny and criminality by your local government on the streets of your community, you DESERVE tyrants and criminals in your national government.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments