“Sometimes Martial Law Is Necessary”

By Doug Newman – please email me
Follow me on Facebook.
And if you would like to post this elsewhere, please just link to this URL as I update my articles frequently. Thanks!

“Sometimes Martial Law Is Necessary”

Thus read a response to my Friday column about the lockdown of 1 million people during the manhunt for one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects. I didn’t “write” that so much as I slapped together a bunch of random thoughts.

I just want to say that I am honored by the response that this received by viral “sharing” of it on Facebook. Thank you, everyone.

Here are some more random bullet points.

1.       On April 19, 1995, a few hours after the bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, a coworker commented on how easy it was for people to just “drive up anywhere”. I asked her if she would prefer to live an alternative kind of society where moving around freely was not an option. Boston on April 19, 2013 was just such a place. The inability to travel freely is a common feature of all totalitarian societies.

The right to travel freely is a prerequisite of liberty.

The Berlin Wall.

    2. If a million people in and around Boston can be put on lockdown for one day, why can’t a million people elsewhere be put on lockdown for 3 or 4 or even more days sometime in the not-too-distant future?

       3. And why were just Boston and some surrounding towns on lockdown? I mean, like, the suspect could have fled to Cape Cod, Worcester, Springfield or Williamstown. Or, he could have crossed state lines. Why not put all of New England and New York on lockdown?

boston martial law 2  4. “But what if the terrorist was on the loose in your neighborhood?” you ask. “Wouldn’t you feel safer being on lockdown?” No, actually I wouldn’t feel safer at all. And while I would certainly appreciate notice that an intensive manhunt was underway, I would also like the opportunity to get the hell out of my neighborhood for my own safety. And you can’t very well do that when you are on lockdown.

5.       5. If you are a “conservative” who approves of the Beantown Lockdown, DON’T EVER complain to me again about nationalized health care, the IRS, gun control or any other big government program. None of these ever resulted in a million people not being able to leave their homes. You deserve every ounce of big government you get.

boston martial law 3

They hate us for our freedom.

6. 6. What  is the next step after a lockdown? Drone strikes? All of America is now a battlefield in the war on terror. And there could be a “suspected militant” right in your neighborhood – a scary looking guy with a name you can’t pronounce from a country you can’t find on a map where the military budget is less than the payroll for the Red Sox infield.  So what if 100 innocent people are killed by a Hellfire missile “if it gets the bad guy.”

drones your house

7.   7. Why not also internment camps for Chechens, Muslims, etc.? I mean, like, desperate times call for desperate measures.

8.      8. “Sometimes you have to give up liberty to have security.” They sang the exact same song in Germany in 1933 as they gave up their liberty for 12 years of sicherheit.

9.      9. And if you don’t think Uncle Sam would kill innocent Americans en masse, think again. And consider the Branch Davidians, the Trail of Tears, the Sand Creek Massacre, Wounded Knee and the War of Northern Aggression from 1861-1865.

        10. About 40 people are murdered every day in America. About 280 have been murdered in the last week. Why do the 4 Boston killings – 3 at the Marathon and the cop at MIT – get all the attention? (And this is not to minimize the grief of those affected by these killings.) Fourteen people perished in the plant explosion in West, Texas, and that has not been nearly as much of a showstopper as the Boston bombing.

Please don't shout as they fiddle about.11. If you think the warrantless searches during the lockdown were “reasonable” because there was a manhunt for a terrorist, do you likewise believe that it is “reasonable” for TSA to molest children at airports?

     12.If you tolerate locking down schools for the safety of the students, why wouldn’t they take the next step and put whole cities on lockdown?

Aurora, June 2, 2012

Aurora, June 2, 2012

    13.If you approve of the police in Aurora, Colorado – where I live – detaining 40 innocent people for 2 hours in order to apprehend one bank robbery suspect, why wouldn’t police restrict the liberty of 1 million people for a whole day?

      14.   If you cheered on the police authorities in Southern California as they shot at innocent people as they hunted down and killed Christopher Dorner with no due process, why wouldn’t cops put entire cities on lockdown to catch a fugitive?

boston celebrating

      15.   It does not surprise me at all that so many chowds celebrated the capture of Dzhokar Tsarnaev while not minding at all that they had been under martial law for the better part of a day. Since 9/11, many millions – perhaps even a majority – of Americans have gladly accepted – in the name of “safety” and “security”: warrantless searches and spying, the suspension of habeas corpus, sexual assault as a condition of travel, rampant police brutality, indefinite detention without any semblance of due process, severe restrictions on peaceful protest and surveillance drones in our skies watching our every move. Are predator drones next?

     16. You will note that I have not mentioned the names of any politicians here. It does not matter at all whom we elect anymore. When you grant unconstitutional power to a president that you like and trust, please know that the next president will inherit and, inevitably, augment these unconstitutional powers.

     17.  “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism.” — U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Davis, Ex Parte Milligan (1866)

     18.   At the “4/20” marijuana rally in Denver on Saturday, 2 people were shot and a third was grazed by a bullet. As this column goes to bed, the suspect remains at large. Should metro Denver – including Aurora, where I live – be put on lockdown for everyone’s “safety”?

      19.   If you profess a belief in Jesus, who would He subject to martial law?

      20.   Do you believe everything the government and their media lapdogs tell you?

terrorism tv

boston resisting

About Food for the Thinkers

My name is Doug Newman. I live in Aurora, Colorado, just outside Denver. Food for the Thinkers is mostly about the connection between Christianity and libertarianism. Most Christians do not understand libertarianism. And most libertarians do not understand Christianity. Hopefully, this blog helps clear up those misunderstanding. Check out my old page at www.thefot.us And remember: When you let people do whatever they want, you get Woodstock. But when you let governments do whatever they want, you get Auschwitz.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to “Sometimes Martial Law Is Necessary”

  1. This, from a Boston resident:
    WRONG!!!! We were not “locked down.” It is called “Shelter-in-place.” It was a choice. Around 5:00 PM Friday my neighbor and I went for a quick walk. She has a 1 year old, 2 year old and a husband who was there when the bombs exploded. She was losing her mind. We walked to the Memorial, around the police barricades and talked to others. The police were kind, did not scold or lecture. They listened to my neighbor’s frustrations, shared their frustrations, I told some bad jokes, we all laughed and then we returned home. Throughout the day we got emails, phone calls, emergency alerts and more from the mayor, police commissioner and governor. They thanked us, asked for patience, shared information and were encouraging. There was absolutely no talk of legal action or arrests.

    Nobody liked getting their home searched. The pictures I saw were of the policemen getting milk for a household full of kids, the three year and army reserve officer exchanging high-fives. People wrote about their experiences. What it was like to stumble into Watertown at 3AM, after a long business trip and get searched. Now, I did not follow the National Media. Twitter had all the information I needed, published by the FBI, Police and so many others. Regular people shared experiences, pictures and videos. Everything and I mean everything, was photographed and posted. There is no doubt in my mind as to what happened. None.

    An officer I spoke with today said people were questioning the burglary of the store, Was it really robbed? Does it matter. The photos from their visit to the store helped police follow them. Are people really afraid the kids are being framed for a robbery?

    I have seen the conspiracy theory sites. If those did not exist, I would worry. Unlike 9/11 — I feel nothing was hidden from us. We were given the choice to “shelter-in-place.” For the greater good — we gave up a day. We ignored the bottom line and did what was best for our city.

    I do not think other cities could do this. We pay high taxes in Massachusetts. The money is used to fund continued building projects*; pay our teacher, fire, police,etc; we provide health care for others, AND almost 20% of our federal taxes goes to other states. Yeah, we bitch and moan, but none of us are moving.

    *The town of Belmont has voted down all road repair work. Seriously, Mitt and his pals do not want to spend — I mean waste — the money.

    • Ed says:

      Doug, here’s a question for the guy who emailed you. He wrote:

      “We were given the choice to “shelter-in-place.” ”

      If you’re given only one option, how is that a choice?

  2. celticdragon says:

    Has anybody noticed in the third picture down that the “officer” in an up-armored Humvee appears to be pointing a weapon directly at the person taking a picture?? Excuse me?

  3. celticdragon says:

    BTW, the two women shot at by LAPD officers in the Dorner manhunt have been given a 4.2 million settlement. I have no doubt that the goons at Policeone will start screaming about how those lazy brown skinned people got the ghetto lottery or some such while saying bad things about those hard working officers who shot them.

  4. Pingback: Lockdowns Do Not Keep You Safe – Letter to the Denver Post | Foodforthethinkers's Blog

  5. Ed says:

    Check out the staged photo of the sheep cheering after their lockdown is lifted. Who has flags on sticks on hand, ready to wave? Nobody I know, and I know some idiots like these cheering their captors.

    it’s impossible to take anything like this seriously. It’s all so obviously fake.

  6. Pingback: I Am Not Afraid of Radical Islam | Foodforthethinkers's Blog

  7. Pingback: “They Fought for Our Freedom” | Foodforthethinkers's Blog

  8. Pingback: What Is Next? An NSA “Kill Switch” for Smartphones? (Or, Three Basic Rules about Tyranny) | Foodforthethinkers's Blog

  9. Pingback: America Is Not a Free Country: 2013 Edition | Foodforthethinkers's Blog

  10. Pingback: Pastor Calls for Martial Law to Get Rid of Obama | Foodforthethinkers's Blog

  11. Pingback: They Fought For Our Freedom? American Veterans Abused By The Police State : Veracity Voice

  12. Pingback: “They Fought for Our Freedom”: American Veterans Abused by the Police State | Conspiracy Wire

Leave a Reply to Ed Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s