Foodforthethinkers's Blog

By Doug Newman
Follow me on Facebook.
If you would like to post this elsewhere, please email me and include a link to this URL. And please don’t post the entire article, just link to it. Why? Because I update many of my articles from time to time. Thanks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism.” — U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Davis, Ex Parte Milligan (1866)

I often hear that we should not “give rights to terrorists.” There is a problem with this statement that may sound philosophical and theological, but has enormous practical implications.

America was founded on the “self-evident” proposition that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” Hence, the rights that we enjoy are gifts from God that are inherent in our humanity. They are not man’s to give or to withhold. They apply equally to all, including native-born Americans and immigrants, citizens and non-citizens.

Consider the wording of the Bill of Rights. It acknowledges rights that existed in 1787 and would exist absent a written Bill of Rights. The Fifth Amendment begins with the words “No person” and goes on to say “nor shall any person.” The Sixth Amendment begins “In all criminal prosecutions…”

It means what it says. And if it doesn’t apply equally to everybody than it doesn’t apply to you.

The biblical requirement of two witnesses to establish guilt can be found in Deuteronomy 19:15. There is no “terrorism exception.” The Golden Rule – Matthew 7:12 – demands the presumption of innocence. Torture – i.e. presuming guilt and forcing a confession – does not measure up to these Scriptural standards.

Furthermore, Scripture tells us to treat foreigners the same way we would treat anyone else – Exodus 22:21 and 23:9; Leviticus 19:34 – and requires equal access for aliens to unbiased justice – Leviticus 24:22; Deuteronomy 1:16, 24:17, 27:19.

Then people object: “But, they are war criminals.” No they are not! There has been no congressional declaration of war, as the Constitution requires. Moreover, terrorists are not “waging war” against us. They can’t, as they have no armies, navies or air forces. They don’t even have uniforms! They don’t even control the government of Yemen, so the idea that they could take over America is beyond absurd. Indeed, it has been several centuries since a Muslim country conquered a non-Muslim country.

(9/11 was an attack on persons and property, but not on our liberty. According to the official story, it was a suicide attack and the 19 hijackers are dead. You cannot take over a country, force everyone to speak Arabic, impose Shari’a law and do all these horrible things when you are – I will say this one more time – DEAD!)

So what is the practical application of this? There is a great quote from St. Thomas More in Robert Bolt’s play A Man for All Seasons:

“What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? … And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you – where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s, and if you cut them down — and you’re just the man to do it — do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake!”

What goes around comes around. It is easy to disregard the Bill of Rights when your party is in power and their intentions sound noble and high-minded. However, just know that there are other people out there who think differently than you and who have other philosophies and priorities. And if you are willing to give your party a free pass, don’t expect the other party to behave any differently.

Millions of right-wingers were oh so nonchalant about the Patriot Act and its violations of the Fourth Amendment. “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear”, they said. “They can probe through my finances if it helps stop terrorism.” Well, now the other party is in office and these same people are now oh so indignant over Obamacare and its violations of financial privacy. You can’t have it both ways.

Many people who would smugly and self-righteously deny others the right – guaranteed by Ninth Amendment – to smoke marijuana are the same people who assert their right – guaranteed by the same Ninth Amendment – to homeschool their children. When you disregard the rights of others – for whatever reason, even an apparently good and noble reason – don’t expect your rights to be safe.

When the plan was to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York City – pursuant to the Sixth Amendment – numerous objections were raised, none of which had anything to do with the rights of the accused. One of the common ones was that “it would be a slap in the face to the 9/11 victims’ families.” (1)

John Belushi at 3 am?

First, don’t be so arrogant as to think that all the 9/11 victims’ families are of one mind about things.

Second, when you violate the Constitution, you set a precedent. It would be the ultimate slap in the face for a relative of a 9/11 victim to one day be hauled off and tried in New Mexico for something they were accused of doing in Hackensack and arbitrarily denied due process protections spelled out in the Bill of Rights.

As if the Bush agenda wasn’t bad enough, Obomber has just issued an executive order claiming the power to incarcerate Guantanamo detainees for the rest of their lives even after acquittal.

(Expect to hear nothing from any Bush groupies about this outrage. Contrary to their fulminations, Obomber is not the polar opposite of Bush. Just as Bush was Clinton on steroids, Obomber is Bush on steroids.)

And if they can do this to scary looking brown guys with funny names and diapers on their heads, they can do it to you. After all, the entire post-9/11 agenda has been about reversing the presumption of innocence and making us all terror suspects.

White-gloved Michael Jackson was creepy enough. Blue-gloved Herbert the Pervert, on the other hand, destroys children’s innocence on the taxvictims’ dime in the name of “keeping us safe.”

This isn’t just about “protecting terrorists.” It is about protecting me.

And, reader, it is about protecting you.

———————————————————————————

(1) The Santa Rosa (CA) Press-Democrat on April 7, 2011 listed numerous examples of terror suspects being tried in the very places where they were accused of committing crimes. And no the earth did not spin off its axis and crash into the sun. Nor has Sports Illustrated started doing an annual burqa issue.

By Doug Newman

The gang at Christians United for Israel (CUFI) has its undies in a bunch about Ron Paul’s amendment to the fiscal 2011 funding bill that would end aid to Israel.

I have an idea: why not try a free-market approach to supporting Israel? I am quite serious. Here is my three-step plan for free-market Zionism.

1)      Shaking down the American taxpayer to provide aid to Israel – or, for that matter, any foreign country – is not just unconstitutional. It is also unbiblical. In the words of II Corinthians 9:7, “So let each one give as he purposes in his heart, not grudgingly or of necessity; for God loves a cheerful giver.”

Christians are never to bankroll their works by force. So if CUFI truly wants to support Israel, let its members reallocate their funds. Instead of, say, building bling-bling megachurches that resemble the Burj Al-Arab Hotel in Dubai, why not pass the hat for Israel? Perhaps CUFI supporters could take a special love offering after each service.

Are there Marine recruiters in the lobby? I bet not.

2)      Of the 12 current senior members of CUFI, only two have any military experience. Instead of sending kids from places like Camden, New Jersey and Muskogee, Oklahoma to fight and bleed and die all over the Middle East for the sake of Israel, why don’t they pay the bill with their own blood? Why don’t they enlist as infantry privates in the Israeli Defense Force? (IDF) And why don’t they encourage the CUFI rank-and-file to do likewise?

Pay the bill with your own blood, Hagee!

3)      If the IDF will not have them for whatever reason, let them form their own detachment to fight alongside the IDF. There are precedents. During the Spanish Civil War, for instance, a group of Americans calling themselves the Abraham Lincoln Brigade fought for the Spanish Republican forces against Franco’s Spanish Nationalists. To be sure, a lot of them were communist sympathizers, but I will give them this: they produced enough testosterone that they put their own lives on the line for their convictions.

Let them call it the Sword of the Lord. It’s just an idea.

The Abe Brigade.

———————————————————————————

Update: 5/20/11. This from a CUFI conference. The fact that these … <<<clears throat>>> Christians cheered this monster shows that they have forgotten all about Jesus Great Commission in Matthew 28:18-20.

———————————————————————————

If you would like to post this elsewhere on the web, please email me and include a link to this URL. Thanks!

By Doug Newman

Simply put: no.

Watch this quick 2:25 video, which gives a brief history of empires in the Middle East.

They have come and gone over the centuries. You have probably never heard of some of them. None have survived permanently. Where, then, does America get off thinking it can bend the Middle East to its will?

———————————————————————–

If you would like to post this elsewhere, please email me and include this URL in your post.

By Doug Newman
Follow me on Facebook.
If you would like to post this elsewhere, please just link to this URL, as I update my articles rather frequently. Thanks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In the following clip, Obama tells the National Prayer Breakfast: “My Christian faith then has been a sustaining force for me over these last few years.”

So there you have it. Obama talked about his Christian faith. It must make him a Christian. Why he might even be almost as great a Christian as his predecessor, Bush Almighty.

Whether or not Obama is a Christian is not my call. That is between him and God. And that is not what this is about. Rather, it is about the gullibility of the American people.

In 2000, when he was running for president, Gubna Dubya was asked what philosopher influenced his thinking the most. He responded: “Well, it’s Jesus Christ because he touched my heart.” That was all that millions of professing Christians needed. Even though he almost never talked about Jesus after that, they made him the object of endless adulation and adoration. Not only was he, like, the most totally awesomest Christian ever, but also, to paraphrase Sting, every little thing he did was Christian.

As Chuck Baldwin once put it, “they (wanted) to add Bush to the Holy Trinity.”

Jesus told His followers to beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing and to know people by their fruits – Matthew 7:15-20. The fruit on Bush’s tree included unprovoked war (1) and the wholesale mass murder of innocents, torture, warrantless searches and spying, guilt without trial and doing nothing to stop the abortion holocaust.  (2) He told the media that we all worship the same God, even though John 14:6 and Acts 4:12 say otherwise. He celebrated Ramadan at the White House.

The last thing these Bush groupies wanted was to be confused with the facts about Our Great Christian President. He said one thing about Jesus one time on the campaign trail and that negated absolutely everything else.

Now that Obama has openly professed his Christian faith, will these same Bush groupies now stop seething with hatred toward Obama and prostrate themselves before him like they did Bush?

When I ponder the fact that so many Christians were so infatuated with Bush and so unconditionally supportive of everything he did, I know exactly why God has allowed an Obama presidency – Daniel 2:21.

“Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD:”
– Amos 8:11

This is exactly what has happened in America. Only in a land of rampant biblical illiteracy could so many people who call themselves Christians be so hopelessly deceived by a man like Dubya. Only in such a land could so many people who say that they worship the Prince of Peace be such bloodthirsty warmongers.

When the Disciples asked Jesus what will be the sign of His Coming and of the end of the world, Jesus replied: “Take heed that no man deceive you.” – Matthew 24:3-4.

By “no man”, Jesus meant just that: NO MAN! Not even Bush. Not even Obama.

Revelation 13:3 tells us that the whole world will one day idolize a political ruler. The personality cults surrounding Bush and Obama are part of what I call the Big Ramp-Up to the fulfillment of this prophecy.
——————————————————————
(1) The proper, moral, constitutional response to things like 9/11 is a “Letter of Marque and Reprisal.” This is a sort of warrant to pursue the specific perpetrators.
(2) And, no, he wasn’t a “conservative” at all. He outspent Kommunist Klinton by $1 trillion per year.
———————————————————————-

If you would like to post this on your page, please email me and include this URL. Thanks!

By Doug Newman

Oh really?

Please take 1 minute and watch this video of a drug raid on a Utah home. The video may well be disturbing, but it is not at all gratuitous.

Do you still think only the police and the military should have guns?

Related links at Opposing Views, The Huffington Post and the Salt Lake Tribune.

———————————————————

If you would like to post elsewhere, please email me and include this link. Thanks!

By Doug Newman

This picture has been making its way around recently. It was posted by a Facebook group called “American’s Against the Tea Party.”

Jesus was not a socialist. He condemns theft and covetousness, i.e. the twin pillars of socialism, as evil – Mark 7:22. Other than kicking the moneychangers out of the Temple, He never initiated force.

Indeed, He had no political agenda, either left-wing or right-wing.

When Satan, the prince of this world, offered Jesus “all the kingdoms of the world,” Jesus rejected the offer – Matthew 4:8-10. Hence, He would have been appalled by America’s troop presence in 140 countries, and its endless aggression and warmongering.

Jesus would not fit into either the left-wing or right-wing mold. His Kingdom is “not of this world” – John 18:36.

Left and right? Liberalism and conservatism? These are worldly philosophies and thus doomed to failure – I Corinthians 1:19-20. Christians are not supposed to yoke themselves unequally with worldly political factions – II Corinthians 6:14.

Stop trying to fit Jesus into your partisan political box. Instead, examine your own worldview and political beliefs. If they don’t measure up to Christ’s Teachings, change how you think.

I have had to do this many times in my life.

"These be thy gods, O Israel..." - Exodus 32:8

__________________________________________

If you would like to post this elsewhere, please include my email as well as this URL.

By Doug Newman

(This was originally published on 1/29/11. I updated it on 12/18/11 upon the news of the death of Kim Jong-Il.)

North Korea has single-payer health care, for which many on the left clamor. It also has the world’s most comprehensive most comprehensive national security apparatus, for which many on the right clamor.

Would you want to live there?

Utopia always sounds good, when someone else is on the business end of it.

Aerial photo of the Korean Peninsula at night.

Don’t be so smug and prideful to think that it can’t happen here. Here are 11 ways that America is trending in the North Korean direction.

North Korea, The Dark State – from 60 Minutes.

________________________________________________

If you would like to post this elsewhere, please include the URL to this article and send me an email. Thanks!

By Doug Newman

I am way too busy now to do much formal blogging. So here are just a few thoughts on the thirty-eighth anniversary of the supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision.

1. The above picture is taken from a remarkable photographic essay from 1999 by a man named Michael Clancy. It documents spina bifida surgery performed at Vanderbilt University Hospital in Nashville on little Samuel at the 21-week mark of his mother’s pregnancy. The picture you see shows Samuel wrapping his hand around the doctor’s finger. A “potential” baby cannot do this. Only a real baby can. Please read this web page in detail.
2. Roe v. Wade was never the “law of the land.” By definition it could not be. Judges cannot make law. Only legislators can. The only reason Roe ever had any weight whatsoever is that so many millions of Americans gave it the weight of law.
3. Republican judges have shown themselves to be just as worthless as Democratic judges in overturning Roe. Five of the seven supreme Court justices in the Roe majority were picked by Republican presidents. In the years between 1973 and 2008, when GW Bush left office, eight of the 10 supreme Court appointments were made by Republican presidents. Moreover, when GW Bush left office, probably two-thirds all federal judges had been appointed by Republicans.
4. It is a complete lie that the Founders never foresaw a rogue judiciary and therefore failed to make provisions to restrain it. Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution empowers Congress to set limits on the powers of the judicial branch. Indeed, Congressman Ron Paul’s Sanctity of Life Act calls on Congress to do just this. To date, it has three co-sponsors.
5. Nullification is all the rage nowadays, and this is a good thing. Numerous states are asserting their prerogatives under the Tenth Amendment to repel Obamacare and marijuana prohibition. Why were they not doing this years ago and just saying no to Roe v. Wade? All it would take is one pro-life governor to step forward and proclaim: “As the chief executive of (name the state), my first duty is to protect innocent life. With this in mind, when the legislature sends me pro-life legislation I am going to ignore Roe v. Wade and sign it into law. And if Uncle Sam doesn’t like it I am going continue ignoring Roe v. Wade and tell Uncle Sam to drop dead.” (Where were Mike Huslterbee, Most Holy Mother Sarah and Bush Almighty when they were governors?)

In the current political climate, I hold no hope that we will see any changes in the legality of abortion any time soon. Education is a very powerful weapon. I cannot urge you too strongly to read Mr. Clancy’s web site in detail. Secular science confirms what the Bible teaches – Psalm 139:16. A baby in its mother’s womb is a person too. To abort it is to kill it. Abortion is murder.

"A person's a person, no matter how small."

Slavery was well on its way too extinction in 1860 and would have gone away without the Civil War. This happened because of profound changes in the hearts and minds of American people regarding the humanity of slaves. The change in laws followed. We may not get our way for now in the legislative realm. However, we can keep talking to people and we can keep educating people about what actually happens in an abortion.

And we can keep on praying that people hear our message. As someone once said, “Praying is both the least we can do and the most we can do.”

By Doug Newman – email me here
Here I am on Facebook.
If you would like to post this elsewhere, please just link to this URL as I update my articles rather frequently. Thanks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is a rehash of a piece I wrote in 2004. I am reworking it because of the calls for additional gun control after the tragic shootings in Tucson on Saturday. I have heard a lot of people say something along these lines:

“I believe people should be allowed to own guns. But there HAS to be SOME control. I mean, there are so many crazy people out there. You can’t let just ANYONE have a gun.”

Herewith are four scenarios to illustrate how gun control does not stop crimes.

• You are a 23-year-old girl and you have recently broken up with your creepazoid boyfriend. He has been stalking you, so you purchase a gun for your protection, and you apply for a concealed carry permit so you can pack heat in your purse. Your application sits on some little nudenik bureaucrat’s desk awaiting his “approval”. Your ex-boyfriend follows you to the grocery store around 10:00 one night. As you exit the store, he proceeds to rape you.
• You came to America from Egypt 25 years ago. You have an MBA and a well-paying job that affords you and your family a comfortable suburban lifestyle. You have thoroughly assimilated into American culture, so much so that you have converted from Islam to Christianity and changed your name from Jamir Ali to James Oliver. There has just been another terrorist attack in American and, in its aftermath, a series of assaults on Arab-Americans. You are walking your dog one evening and four redneck punkazoids jump you, beat you to a bloody pulp and leave you to die. Your concealed carry application is sitting on the same desk as the application of the young lady in the first scenario.
• On the morning of April 20, 1999, you and 1800 other people are going about your daily business in a gun-free zone in Littleton, Colorado. Two psychopathic malcontents walk in and start spraying bullets, killing 13 people before they kill themselves. No one shoots back, because this is a “gun-free zone.”
• On the morning of September 11, 2001, you are a crew member aboard a gun-free zone that has just been commandeered by terrorists. One of them pulls out a box cutter and slits your throat. You are defenseless, as this is a gun-free zone. After these terrorists off you, they proceed to off the pilot and co-pilot, who are similarly defenseless. And then all hell really breaks loose. (1)

Each of the above stories involves crazy people and normal people. Each involves people who obeyed gun laws suffering at the hands of people who were undeterred by gun laws.

In only one of the above cases did the assailants use guns. In perpetrating their orgy or blood, Harris and Klebold broke something like 20 laws. If someone plots for over a year to undertake something as horrific as Columbine or 9/11, they are by definition not deterred by your silly-posterior gun laws.

Gun laws do not deter crime. If you are determined enough, you will use a gun anyway (Harris and Klebold) or you will find a plan B such as a knife (whoever killed Ron and Nicole), fertilizer (Tim McVeigh), a bathtub (Andrea Yates) or box cutters (according to the official 9/11 story). The only people affected by gun laws are law abiders.

In the words of an old billboard, 10 out of 10 criminals prefer their victims disarmed. Disarming crazy people does not make them less crazy or less criminal. It just leaves law-abiding people defenseless. Evil abhors a vacuum. When you disarm innocent people bad things happen.

The Second Amendment to our Constitution states:

“A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”

This Amendment does not “grant” any rights. It guarantees a “right of the people” that existed already – see Luke 22:36. It does not merely apply to defense against murderers, rapists and robbers, but to tyrants as well. The “well-regulated Militia” of which it speaks does not mean the federally armed and sponsored National Guard, but rather citizens skilled in both the use of firearms as well as teamwork in the field.

Such a militia was necessary not for the security of any old willy-nilly state, but of a “free state.” Militias played a vital part in securing this nation’s independence. The Founders understood that an armed populace was an essential counterforce against tyranny.

The history of the last century bears witness to this. Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership posts a wonderful illustration of the relationship between gun control and genocide. Various degrees of gun control – licensing, confiscation, bans on private ownership, bans on concealed carry, requiring demonstration of a “need” to own a firearm – led to genocide in Armenia, Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, Red China, Guatemala, Uganda, Cambodia and Rwanda.

The world’s worst crazies can be found in government. The sicker they are, the more power they accumulate. Show me a tyrant – Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Kim Il-Sung, Kim Jong-Il, Castro – who is not certifiably insane. The ultimate aim of gun control is to totally disarm the citizenry and leave them defenseless against psychopaths who pull the strings of power.

And if you believe “we should take away all the guns”, ask yourself what you mean by “we” as well as how such a “take away” shall be implemented.

If you believe “we should take away all the guns”, you had better think twice. And three or four or five times if necessary.

“But,” you ask, “what would you say if you or a loved one were a victim of gun violence?”

I don’t know what I would say. (2) And it really irks me when people claim to speak for other people. Some victims of gun violence support more gun control and some don’t. Some black people blindly support Obama and some don’t. Some military veterans support all of America’s wars and some don’t. One’s demographic does not necessarily determine one’s political views.

Tom Mauser, who lost a son at Columbine, has advocated for more gun control. Darryl Scott, who lost a daughter at Columbine, has been very vocal saying Columbine was a result of moral breakdown, and that more gun laws are not the answer.

I leave you with this interview with John Green, whose nine-year-old daughter was so tragically killed on Saturday morning. At the 1:40 mark, he states that “we don’t need any more restrictions on our society.”

Indeed we don’t. Let us not succumb to the emotions of the moment. Liberty is a lot easier to surrender than it is to get back.

(1)  This is not a 9/11 truth post. I respect the truth movement and I have several doubts about the official story. However, this is about gun control. Any 9/11 truth comments WILL be deleted.
(2) I lost a friend, Gordon Cowden, in the Aurora theater shooting of July 20, 2012. Even so, I stand foursquare in opposition to any gun control.