If “Ignorance of the Law Is No Defense”

By Doug Newman

If “ignorance of the law is no defense” then you, reader, are responsible for knowing all the laws contained within these tomes and complying with them to the letter.

Library at Yale Law School

If “ignorance of the law is no defense”, then you, reader, are responsible for knowing all 2 million laws on the books in this country, including all 11 million words of the Internal Revenue Code.

Also, if “ignorance of the law is no defense” why do we even bother having lawyers? After all, if we all know all the laws, we can handle all our own legal matters ourselves and don’t need to shell out all that dinero for attorney fees.

On a related topic, if you think that “if you are doing nothing wrong you have nothing to fear”, how do you know you are doing nothing that someone somewhere in a position of power thinks is wrong?
___________________________________________________________

If you would like to post this elsewhere – who knows why? – please email me and include a link to this URL.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

So Who Was the Most Libertarian President?

By Doug Newman

One of the plethora of reasons I like sports much more than politics is that the answers in sports are much more easily quantifiable. Success in sports is merit-based, whereas in politics it is all about spin, image, manipulation and propaganda.

Elections are not basketball tournaments. Success and failure have nothing whatsoever to do with objective measurements of merit.

In a sane world, a presidential greatness index would be similar to a golf score or a pitcher’s earned run average, i.e. the lower the better. The lower the president’s index, the greater he would be.

However, in a world without .300 hitters or 1,000-yard rushers, how do you determine greatness or non-greatness?

Enter a young guy from Phoenix, Arizona by the name of Xavier Cromartie. In the late part of 2009, he released an absolutely fascinating article wherein he assigns scores and rankings for presidents of the United States with libertarianism as the main criteria.

The article lists 43 presidents, as Grover Cleveland was president twice. Cleveland was also rated as the second most libertarian in this study, behind only Martin Van Buren.

Our most libertarian president? Well, this study says so.

Please read this disclaimer about Obama at the top of the article.

Anyway, this article is based not on “liberalism” or “conservatism”, i.e. words that lost meaning a long time ago. Rather, it is an attempt – quite a good one, I might add – to measure objectively how much each president respected individual liberty.

There is a lot here that a lot of people will not like. And if you don’t like the findings here, you need to get honest with yourself and re-examine a few things.

Let the arguing begin.

And if you support liberty, then you need to support Ron Paul for President in 2012. Based on his voting record 12 terms in Congress, he will be more libertarian than Van Buren.

And his policies won’t kill any Native Americans either.
_____________________________________________________________
Classic article by Lew Rockwell from 1996: Down with the Presidency.
_____________________________________________________________
If you would like to post this elsewhere – who knows why? – please email me and include a link to this URL. Thanks!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Ron Paul Limerick

By Doug Newman

There once was a man from Nantucket,
Who wanted to sell me a bucket,
But he couldn’t, because,
There were too many laws,
So he threw up his hands and said, “Vote for RON PAUL!”
______________________________________________________________

OK, this wasn’t totally my idea. Just my twist on something I heard on a call to talk radio several years ago. The caller no doubt also borrowed his idea from something similar.
__________________________________________________________

If you would like to post this elsewhere, please email me and include a link to this URL.
Thanks! – Doug

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

You Asked for It, You Got It: Obamacare

By Doug Newman

I originally wrote this on August 27, 2010.
_____________________________________

Socialism needs two legs on which to stand; a right and a left.
While appearing to be in complete opposition to one another,
they both march in the same direction.
– Paul Proctor

Thomas Jefferson once wrote that “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.” Dictionary definitions of eternal include “continued without intermission” or “valid or existing at all times.”

We must be equally protective of our liberties at all times, regardless of who is in office, regardless of their party and regardless of how noble their stated aims might be.

Obamacare has been a long time coming, even when Republicans held power. How’s that? Let us look at six common objections.

First, Obamacare represents reckless, bloated and socialistic government. Yet, when GW Bush and the Republicans outspent Bill Clinton by $1 trillion per year the predominant response from rank-and-file Republicans was either denial or justification. Not only did Bush expand every big government, liberal, socialist program that they said they hated, but he added some of his own. Bush was Bill Clinton on steroids.

Second, Obamacare represents a federal takeover of the medical marketplace. Yet, when the Republicans left town in January, 2009, Uncle Sam, through programs like Medicare, already controlled about 60 percent of the medical marketplace. Not only that, but GW Bush and a Republican House and Senate gave us a massive expansion of the federal role in health care with the 2003 prescription drug benefit. But, they were conservatives, weren’t they?

If you gave Bush an inch, don't complain to me when Obama takes a mile.

Third, federal control of healthcare is not authorized by the Constitution. I agree. Nor is ninety-five percent of what Uncle Sam does. This includes lots of things conservatives like, such as the wars on drugs, terror, Afghanistan and Iraq. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution never restrained conservatives. Why should we expect liberals to respect it?

Fourth, no one has read the bill in its entirety. This is nothing new. In 2001, Congress voted overwhelmingly for the 300-page Patriot Act after having only 20 minutes to read it. A lot of folks who support the Patriot Act are now objecting to Obamacare on the grounds that no one has read it or knows everything that is in there. Too bad, so sad. When you let your party’s bills sail through Congress without being read, don’t come crying to me when the other party passes bills they don’t read. Indeed, most bills that get through Congress are not read in their entirety.

Fifth, Obamacare violates financial privacy. Consider this from a blog called Values Voter News: “ObamaCare Violates Financial Privacy. Cloaked in the unassuming garment of ‘fraud protection’, ObamaCare in its current form would require the IRS to divulge taxpayer identity  income, number of dependents and ‘other information as prescribed’ by regulation.”

Weren’t these same “values voters” the biggest supporters of GW Bush’s post-9/11 agenda? Wasn’t one of the pillars of this the Patriot Act, which authorized massive intrusions on financial privacy? (In the words of LewRockwell.com’s Rick Fisk: “Values voters have strange values.”)

And finally, Obamacare takes away our freedom to make our own decisions. To quote Chris Farley’s character Matt Foley, “Well lah-de-FRIGGIN’-DAH!”

Many of the people who are the most outspoken against Obamacare are also opposed to medical marijuana. The right to ingest that hooch for medicinal purposes – and indeed for any purpose whatsoever – is protected by the Ninth Amendment. This same amendment protects your right to home school your kids. It protects your right to do all kinds of things regardless of whether or not someone else approves.

If you would deny others the right to smoke medical marijuana, you do not believe in medical freedom. (I would also invite you to consider what you would do if you were in excruciating pain and had exhausted all other options other than medical marijuana. Would thou still be as holy as thou currently art?) If you would micromanage how others medicate themselves, just know that there are people who think differently than you that would micromanage your medical treatment.

Mitt gave Massachusetts Romneycare. Look at the video at the very bottom of this essay - Newt favors national healthcare. Rick voted for the prescription drug benefit. RON PAUL OPPOSES ALL OF IT!

Lew Rockwell once wrote that “The problem with American conservatism is that it hates the left more than the state … believes brute force is the answer to all social problems. It has never understood the idea of freedom as a self-ordering principle of society. It has never seen the state as the enemy of what conservatives purport to favor.”

This whole march toward Obamacare has me paraphrasing the old Toyota jingle. You asked for it, you got it: Obamacare. For decades, conservatives have been so implicitly trusting of Republicans as they recklessly disregarded constitutional limits on federal power. Why are they so outraged and indignant as Democrats run wild when they gain power?


EXCELLENT LETTER TO THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE  in response to this by Richard Bartucci, a fellow son of the Garden State.
_____________________________________
In the event that you would like to post this elsewhere – who knows why? – please email me and include a link to this URL. Thanks!
_____________________________________
Do you still think Obamacare will give us “free” healthcare? Think again.

Newt Gingrich endorses national health care.

Many on the right want to sell to us this totalitarian as the polar opposite of Obama.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supply and Demand in the Bible

By Doug Newman

A few years ago, I emailed someone who is far more of a Bible scholar than I will ever be and asked him if the Bible addressed the issue of supply and demand. He provided me with some interesting answers.

Although the Bible does not handle the concept of supply and demand the way economists do in textbooks, it does touch on the subject in some very practical ways.

It is in The Book.

Proverbs 27:20 on the issue of demand – “Hell and destruction are never full; so the eyes of man are never satisfied.” (See also Ecclesiastes 1:8.)

Proverbs 20:14 also relating to demand – “It is naught, it is naught, saith the buyer: but when he is gone his way, then he boasteth.” People love to negotiate a price down and then brag to their friends about the “great deal” they got.

Deuteronomy 28:1-14 – God will bestow abundant supply and blessing on His people when they obey His commands.

Deuteronomy 28:15-68 – God will curse His people with scarcity when they do not obey His commands.

II Kings 6:24-29 describes scarcity and resulting high prices during the Syrian siege of Samaria. Keep reading through II Kings 7:1-20 and you will see how prices drop as commodities become more abundant after the siege is lifted. This is a reflection of market fluctuations, and not a result of statist edict.

As an old pastor friend of mine once said, “God’s fingerprint is on everything.” This includes the economic laws of supply and demand. There are no doubt other Scriptures that apply to this subject. Please email me if you can cite any examples.
___________________________________________________

If you would like to post this elsewhere – who knows why? – please email me and include a link to this URL. Thanks! – dfn

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

“I’m Not Going to Plead Guilty to Using My Medicine.”

By Doug Newman

Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies … those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. – C.S. Lewis

Fair Haven, a quaint little town of about 6000 residents somewhere in the swamps of Jersey, holds a very special place in my heart and life. Why? Because I grew up there.

Home.

It is also the home of my new hero: Eric Hafner. Hafner is real life example #4,479,563 or so of how America’s War on Drugs is incontrovertibly insane. Here are the Cliff Notes on his story.

In 2008, at age 16, the young Hafner had a “horrifying, traumatic” experience that brought on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD. He declines to divulge details and this is his prerogative. And how he medicates himself would likewise be his prerogative if this were a free country.

This is medicine. Don't like it? TOUGH!

In a free country, people would still suffer traumatic life experiences. However, their choice of medication would be entirely immune from the tentacles of state and federal control.

Doctors prescribed Xanax for Eric. However, he claimed that it “did little to mitigate ‘nightmares, flashbacks and depression,’ and left him feeling ‘like a zombie’ the next day.” However, he claims that marijuana allowed him to function normally.

End of story, right?

No.

This is not a free country.

In 2010, Governor Corzine signed into law the Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act. This law allows patients who suffer from certain maladies such as AIDS and MS, to obtain marijuana from state-licensed dispensaries. Two years later, though, no dispensaries have opened their doors. And even if they had, PTSD is not among the conditions for which doctors are allowed to recommend marijuana.

On November 27 of last year, Hafner was a passenger in a car that was pulled over for a broken headlight in Locust, four miles from Fair Haven. The police officer said he smelled pot and proceeded to search the vehicle. The search turned up a pipe in Hafner’s sweatshirt and a gram of the forbidden weed in Hafner’s wallet.

Hafner faces up to six months in jail and $1000 in fines if found guilty.

Here comes the hero part.

Hafner states: “I’m not going to plead guilty to using my medicine.”

Eric Hafner: hometown hero. Ron Paul supporter, too!

A guilty plea would carry with it probation and mandatory drug testing.

Hafner cites Article I of the New Jersey state Constitution in his defense. This article states, in part:

“All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain natural and unalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness.”

Hafner goes on to say: “I’m not going to stop what I’m doing, so probation is not an option. I’d be sacrificing my own health and safety, and I’m not going to do that, and the government has no right to tell me to do that.”

Denver is the marijuana dispensary capital of America.

Out here near Denver, Colorado, where I live now, a friend recently stated the following on Facebook.

“You know what really gets my knickers in a twist? Aurora. Charging me extra money to buy cold medicine. And my Driver’s License having to be swiped to buy Alka-Seltzer in PILL form. Really? Do I look like I’m gonna OD on Alka-Seltzer??? Unfortunately, my moral indignation lost out to the need to not feel like death walking backwards eating a cracker… but still. I’m pretty ticked.”

To this, I responded: “Yay drug war.”

P.W. chimed in: “No Doug….Yay nanny state.”

Me, again: “2 wings of the same bird of prey.”

I went on to say: “A government that will throw you in jail for possessing, selling, buying or using a plant that probably grows wild in your zip code will not be restrained in the stupid laws and regulations it imposes.”

The mindset that drives the right’s police state is the exact same totalitarian mindset that drives the left’s nanny state. A government that will imprison you for using a plant that was given to us in the eleventh verse of the Bible – and just may well grow wild in Fair Haven – will inevitably also tell us which kind of light bulbs to use and how fast our toilets can flush. And if you have your undies in a bunch over someone medicating themselves with marijuana, then you already believe that the state should nanomanage medical decisions. Don’t moan and groan at me about Obamacare!

Does the Forbidden Weed grow wild here? Maybe so.

The left is at least honest about its belief in big government. The right, on the other hand, is rhetorically pro-liberty, but all too often loves big government when it imprisons people for victimless offenses. (“Victimless crime” is an oxymoron. If there is no victim, there is no crime.) No matter how much evidence you present about the abject failure of the drug war, they simply will not cast off their smelly little politically correct orthodoxies about their menu of favorite unconstitutional federal programs.

All federal laws relating to what you ingest into your body are unconstitutional under the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. And while the states may pass their own drug laws, state drug laws are just as odious as the Jim Crow laws of the old South.

But then the objection always arises: “There are prescription drugs for things like PTSD.” Go back and read the quote at the top of this article. Hafner says that Xanax didn’t work. Thousands of other people across the nation also say that marijuana worked where prescription drugs didn’t.

Many who scoff at the notion that cannabis has medicinal properties will insist that they are Christians. Jesus had very harsh words for people like this. “Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.” – Luke 11:46, KJB

While no one has ever died simply from smoking marijuana, prescription drug fatalities now outnumber deaths from automobile accidents.  And with prescription drugs, it is also the little things. You know, like the multitudinous side effects.

Moreover, it is perfectly legal to do irreparable damage to your body in so many ways.

And, yes, I hear the train a-coming:  “The kid is just looking for an excuse to get stoned.”

Let’s see. Hafner gets his bake on, gets the munchies and veges out for a few hours to some pre-Dark Side Pink Floyd tunes. Who has he harmed?

Not you.

And yet, there are millions of people who wouldn’t care if he were locked in some anal rape cage for years on end. For his own good, of course. 99.99 percent of the time, the legal penalties associated with marijuana possession do far more damage than the actual herb itself. Cruel and unusual, anyone?

And these millions just don’t care that the War on Drugs has, in the last three decades, turned the “land of the free” into the nation with the world’s highest incarceration rate.

And while Hafner faces six months in prison, and while this Oklahoma woman got ten years for a $31 marijuana sale, the children of the elites are not punished anywhere near as severely. Noelle Bush – one of those Bushes – got ten days for possession of crack cocaine. Hence, the War on Drugs is a lot like other wars. The elites sell it and the hoi polloi suffer as a result of it.

Daughter of a governor. Niece of a president. Granddaughter of another president. Got 10 days for crack possession. Live as the elites say and not as they and their offspring live.

The War on Drugs is a war on all of us, whether we do illegal drugs or not. How so?

Imagine yourself suffering from unremitting pain and having exhausted all conventional medical remedies. You are down to one last option: that herb that you have, until now, ridiculed as the Devil’s Lettuce. Will thou, in this moment, still be as holy and pious as thou currently art?

Or will this life experience finally clue you in as to the tyrannical nature of drug prohibition? Will you finally realize that the real-world implications of your favorite social policy are no laughing matter? And when you find yourself in the cross hairs of the authorities, will you boldly and defiantly proclaim, like Eric Hafner: “I’m not going to plead guilty to using my medicine.”

It is always easy to sit there and say that the government should “do something”, as long as they do it to somebody else.
___________________________________________________________
Newt Gingrich’s PRO-medical marijuana letter to the editor, 1982
___________________________________________________________
Posted at DailyPaul, Red State Eclectic and on Facebook.
___________________________________________________________
In the event that you would like to post this elsewhere – who knows why? – please email me and include a link to this URL. Thanks!
___________________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Just What Kind of People Support Ron Paul?

By Doug Newman
_____________________________________________________
Special thanks to Lew Rockwell for running this on February 2, 2012 on Lew Rockwell’s Political Theatre. Far and away the biggest day ever on www.foodforthethinkers.com with 1489 views. February 3, 2012 was the second best with 877 views. Until now, the biggest day had been September 11, 2011 with 463 views. _____________________________________________________
BillyDKidd wrote this on a blog in 2008.

“After watching Tucker (Carlson) last night it dawned on me what has been obvious all along – nobody in the media understands the Ron Paul movement at all – not even Tucker whom I would have thought would know better. In Tucker’s mind the only people who could possibly support Ron Paul are the relative handful of people in this country like him who “really understand” what Ron Paul is about, leftists who hate the war and tin foil hat wearing, ex-hippie conspiracy theorists. Well yes, we are all of those things, but we are also doctors and lawyers and soldiers and scientists.

“And we are civil libertarians and conservatives and liberals and democrats and republicans and libertarians and constitutionalists. We are shelf stockers at Walmart and high powered executives and self-employed small business owners and internet gurus. We are policemen and firemen and ditch diggers and even people on public assistance. We are black and white and asian and hispanic and some mixture of all of these things. We are people whose ancestors came over on the Mayflower and whose ancestors met those people when they arrived. We are people who became Americans six months ago.

“We are young, pot-smoking college freshmen and guys who fought in Vietnam. We are people of virtually every possible stripe and persuasion who all have one single thing in common — we love this country and want to see the promise of what America was intended to be fulfilled, so that we can leave our children the American we grew up believing in — free and prosperous nation with justice and opportunity for all where any person who wants it and is willing to put in the effort has a reasonable chance of being whatever he or she wants to be and can make a better life for their children than they had. We want an America which is the land of liberty and where the idea of the pursuit of happiness means something.

“A place where courage and gumption and effort and creativity count for something — where the deck is not pre-stacked so that those on top can not lose no matter what they do and those on the bottom have little hope of winning no matter how hard they try. And where our leaders are people we can be proud of and who represent the best of what America is and not America at its basest and most venal. As for myself, I am proud to be associated with all of these types of Ron Paul supporters — even the wackiest among us. I happily welcome all the tin foil hat wearers and the hippies as well as the veterans and the old right conservatives and even the lefty liberals. When I start hearing stuff about needing to keep the movement “pure” then I know I’m talking to somebody who doesn’t understand the movement at all.”
—————————————————————-
If you would like to post this elsewhere – who knows why? – please email me and include a link to this URL. Thanks!
—————————————————————-

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments